![]() ![]() The court found Advanced Steel liable for the difference between its original quote and the price paid by Civil Construction in securing another subcontractor for the structural steel portion of the project:Ĭivil could not force Advanced to sign a construction contract that included a scope of work beyond Advanced’s bid unless Advanced agreed to that.Īt the same time Advanced had a duty to enter into a construction contract B that reflected the scope of the work that it offered to do in its bid for the price it stipulated, and Civil had a duty to enter into that construction contract as well if that was all Advanced would agree to. Civil Construction was awarded the contract but Advanced Steel refused to honour its sub-tender. ![]() That sub-tender was incorporated into Civil Construction’s main tender. The subcontractor, Advanced Steel, put in a bid to the prime bidder, Civil Construction, for the structural steel component of the project, stating that its sub-tender was valid for 30 days. The case dealt with a tender call issued by the City of Richmond for the construction of a drainage pump station upgrade. Advanced Steel Structures Inc., the British Columbia Supreme Court found a subcontractor liable to the prime bidder for failing to honour its sub-tender. In its October 2011 decision in Civil Construction Co. This article is an excerpt from Government Procurement, which is available for purchase. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |